Evaluating the Efficacy of Sport-Specific Physical Adaptations in National Youth Track and Field Athletes in Ho Chi Minh City Across a Training Macrocycle

Authors

  • Nguyen Van Tang*, Vo Van Hao, Pham Thi Diem University of Sport Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Keywords:

youth track and field, neuromuscular adaptation, training cycle, field-based assessment, Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD)

Abstract

Background: Monitoring physiological and physical adaptations throughout successive training cycles represents a fundamental component of the Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) framework, particularly during adolescence when biological maturation substantially influences athletic performance. This study investigated changes in physiological characteristics and sport-specific physical performance among elite youth track and field athletes training at the National Sports Training Center, Ho Chi Minh City, following a general preparatory training cycle.

Methods: A longitudinal observational study was conducted involving 15 elite youth track and field athletes (10 males and 5 females; aged 15–17 years). Participants completed a comprehensive battery of 19 validated field-based assessments before and after the training cycle. Measurements included anthropometric characteristics, maximal strength (one-repetition maximum [1RM]), explosive power (countermovement jump [CMJ] and standing long jump), and aerobic endurance estimated indirectly using the 20-m shuttle run (Beep Test) for predicted VO₂max. Within-group changes were analyzed using paired-samples t-tests, with statistical significance established at p< 0.05.

Results: Following the training intervention, both male and female athletes demonstrated statistically significant improvements in maximal and explosive strength variables, including squat, deadlift, snatch, and standing long jump performances (p< 0.05). Aerobic endurance, assessed by the Beep Test, also improved significantly in both sexes (p< 0.05). Conversely, no significant changes were observed in anthropometric variables (height and body mass) or short-sprint performance over 30 m and 60 m (p> 0.05). Female athletes exhibited a significant reduction in body fat percentage following the training cycle (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: The general preparatory training program effectively promoted neuromuscular and cardiovascular adaptations in elite youth track and field athletes. However, the absence of significant improvements in maximal sprint speed suggests that subsequent macrocycles should place greater emphasis on event-specific speed development and advanced sport-specific training to facilitate the transfer of strength gains into sprint performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bissas, A., Havenetidis, K., Walker, J., Hanuskova, D., & Lenton, P. (2022). Muscle fiber type characteristics and performance profiles of elite track and field athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 36(3), 735-742. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003498

Bompa, T. O., & Buzzichelli, C. A. (2019). Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training (6th ed.). Human Kinetics. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781492589332

Bourdon, P. C., Cardinale, M., Murray, A., Gastin, P., Kellmann, M., Varley, M. C., & Cable, N. T. (2017). Monitoring athlete training loads: Consensus statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(Suppl 2), S2-161. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0208

Buchheit, M. (2014). Monitoring training status with HR measures: Do all roads lead to Rome? Frontiers in Physiology, 5, 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00073

Cormie, P., McGuigan, M. R., & Newton, R. U. (2011). Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 2 - training considerations for improving maximal power production. Sports Medicine, 41(2), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.2165/11538500-000000000-00000

Ford, P., De Ste Croix, M., Lloyd, R., Meyers, R., Moosavi, M., Oliver, J., Till, K., & Williams, C. (2011). The long-term athlete development model: Physiological evidence and application. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(4), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.536849

Gabbett, T. J. (2016). The training—injury prevention paradox: Should athletes be training smarter and harder? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788

Gonzalez-Badillo, J. J., & Sanchez-Medina, L. (2010). Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 31(05), 347-352. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1248333

Halson, S. L. (2014). Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Medicine, 44(Suppl 2), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z

Impellizzeri, F. M., Marcora, S. M., & Coutts, A. J. (2019). Internal and external training load: 15 years on. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 14(2), 270-273. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0935

Kraemer, W. J., Ratamess, N. A., & French, D. N. (2005). Resistance training for health and performance. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 4(3), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CSMR.0000306197.86470.a6

Lloyd, R. S., Oliver, J. L., Faigenbaum, A. D., Howard, R., De Ste Croix, M. B. A., Williams, C. A., ... & Myer, G. D. (2014). Long-term athletic development-part 1: A pathway for all youth. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(5), 1439-1450. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000383

McGuigan, M. R., Cormack, S. J., & Gill, N. D. (2012). Strength and power profiling of athletes: Selecting tests and how to use them for training prescription. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 34(6), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e318285dfb0

Meeusen, R., Duclos, M., Foster, C., Fry, A., Gleeson, M., Nieman, D., ... & Urhausen, A. (2013). Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: Joint consensus statement of the ECSS and the ACSM. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 45(1), 186-205. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318279a10a

Mujika, I., & Padilla, S. (2003). Scientific bases for precompetition tapering strategies. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35(7), 1182-1187. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000074448.73621.11

Saw, A. E., Main, L. C., & Gastin, P. B. (2016). Monitoring the athlete training response: Subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: A systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094758

Soligard, T., Schwellnus, M., Alonso, J. M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., ... & Engebretsen, L. (2016). How much is too much? (Part 1) IOC consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(17), 1030-1041. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581

Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., & Stone, M. H. (2016). The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Medicine, 46(10), 1419-1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0486-0

Van Hooren, B., & Zolotarjova, J. (2017). The difference between countermovement and squat jump performances: A review of underlying mechanisms with practical applications. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(7), 2011-2020. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001913

Williams, S., West, S., Cross, M. J., & Stokes, K. A. (2017). Better way to determine the acute: chronic workload ratio? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(3), 209-210. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096589

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

Pham Thi Diem, N. V. T. V. V. H. (2026). Evaluating the Efficacy of Sport-Specific Physical Adaptations in National Youth Track and Field Athletes in Ho Chi Minh City Across a Training Macrocycle. Current Clinical and Medical Education, 4(7), 1–9. Retrieved from https://visionpublisher.info/index.php/ccme/article/view/333

Issue

Section

Articles